Born: 1877
Died: 1953
Gender: Male
Nationality: French
"What I wanted to do was to carry my investigations further than
those of the Impressionists. The Impressionists looked for the
inter-relationships of flecks and patches of colour, and that in itself
was good. Now, however, we need something more than the satisfaction of
vision alone; we need to create the world of things unseen." Raoul
Dufy.
|
|
Raoul Dufy was born in Le Havre,
Normandy, already one of the most lively centres of contemporary
painting. His training was initially strictly academic, first at the
Ecole Municipale des Beaux-Arts du Havre (where he met Othon Friesz and
Georges Braque) and at the Ecole des Beaux-Arts in Paris.
In 1901 he first exhibited his work at
the Salon des Artistes Français. The following year he graduated to the
Salon des Indépendants. With paintings such as 'The Courtyard of the
Louvre' (1902), Dufy had shed all traces of Impressionism and Symbolism
and had found his own voice. In 1905 to 1906 Dufy worked in the Fauvist
movement, in which colour was one of the most important factors to many
though design was the primary concern for Dufy. He was intent on
depicting the 'unseen'. He also encountered other challenging movements
and centres such as Cézanne's | Provence and Expressionist Germany, but
being sure of his direction was never seduced by them, although he was
certainly open to experimentation.
Dufy invented rather than represented
nature. He was extraordinarily optimistic and this is evident in his
airy paintings. He understood the world in terms of decorative art and
indeed turned his attention to textile design for a while, which like
his paintings were a tapestry of clear colours. The figures in his
paintings are often like characters in a play, for example 'Harlequin in
the Venetian Manner' (1939) in which a particular figure takes centre
stage and directs the emotions of the audience. In this way he found
great joy in depicting public events with their pomp and ceremony, such
as 'The Coronation of King George VI' (1937). Many argue that his
paintings lack substance, others say that they simply express a delight
in life. |